Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 903
Filtrar
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2315653, 2024 Dec 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38372046

RESUMO

To investigate the HPV vaccine coverage and post-vaccination adverse reactions in Gansu Province, Western China, from 2018 to 2021. Data on suspected adverse reactions to HPV vaccines were collected from the Chinese Vaccine Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI). Estimate the incidence rates of Common Adverse Reaction and Rare Adverse Reaction. HPV vaccine coverage among females in different age groups was calculated using data from the Gansu Provincial Immunization Information Platform. The first-dose HPV vaccine coverage rate among females aged 9 to 45 was 2.02%, with the lowest rate of less than 1% observed in females aged 9 to 14. From 2018 to 2021, the incidence rates of Common Adverse Reaction and Rare Adverse Reaction reported in females after HPV vaccination were 11.82 and 0.39 per 100,000 doses, respectively. Common Adverse Reaction included fever (5.52 per 100,000 doses), local redness and swelling (3.33 per 100,000 doses), fatigue (3.15 per 100,000 doses), headache (2.76 per 100,000 doses), as well as local induration and nausea/vomiting (1.97 per 100,000 doses). Adverse reactions mainly occurred within 1 day after vaccination, followed by 1 to 3 days after vaccination. The HPV vaccine coverage rate among females aged 9 to 14 in Gansu Province is remarkably low, and there is an urgent need to enhance vaccine coverage. From 2018 to 2021, the incidence of Adverse reaction Following Immunization HPV vaccination fell within the expected range, indicating the vaccine's safety profile.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/etiologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Imunização , China/epidemiologia
5.
Nat Med ; 29(12): 3224-3232, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049621

RESUMO

Cervical cancer burden is high where prophylactic vaccination and screening coverage are low. We demonstrated in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, controlled trial that single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination had high vaccine efficacy (VE) against persistent infection at 18 months in Kenyan women. Here, we report findings of this trial through 3 years of follow-up. Overall, 2,275 healthy women aged 15-20 years were recruited and randomly assigned to receive bivalent (n = 760), nonavalent (n = 758) or control (n = 757) vaccine. The primary outcome was incident-persistent vaccine type-specific cervical HPV infection. The primary evaluation was superiority analysis in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) HPV 16/18 and HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 cohorts. The trial met its prespecified end points of vaccine type-specific persistent HPV infection. A total of 75 incident-persistent infections were detected in the HPV 16/18 mITT cohort: 2 in the bivalent group, 1 in the nonavalent group and 72 in the control group. Nonavalent VE was 98.8% (95% CI 91.3-99.8%, P < 0.0001) and bivalent VE was 97.5% (95% CI 90.0-99.4%, P < 0.0001). Overall, 89 persistent infections were detected in the HPV 16/18/31/33/45/52/58 mITT cohort: 5 in the nonavalent group and 84 in the control group; nonavalent VE was 95.5% (95% CI 89.0-98.2%, P < 0.0001). There were no vaccine-related severe adverse events. Three years after vaccination, single-dose HPV vaccination was highly efficacious, safe and conferred durable protection. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03675256 .


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano 18 , Quênia/epidemiologia , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Infecção Persistente , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/métodos , Método Duplo-Cego
6.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(3): 2283912, 2023 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38038626

RESUMO

Following the approval of Cervarix for the immunization of girls and women in China against high-risk human papillomavirus types 16 and 18, a non-interventional post-authorization safety study was performed. A multi-center prospective cohort study assessed safety following Cervarix vaccination of Chinese girls and women aged 9-45 years between 31 May 2018 and 3 December 2020. Adverse events following immunization (AEFIs), potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs), and pregnancy-related outcomes were collected up to 12 months from the third immunization or 24 months from the first immunization, whichever came first. Among 3,013 women who received 8,839 Cervarix doses, 167 (5.5%) reported ≥ 1 any AEFI, and 22 (0.7%) reported 40 serious AEFIs. During the 30 days after each dose, 147 women (4.9%) reported 211 medically attended AEFIs, including 3 serious AEFIs reported by 1 woman (0.03%). One woman reported a pIMD. Cervarix was inadvertently administered to 65 women (2.2%) within 60 days before conception or during pregnancy. Of these women, 34 (52.3%) gave birth to live infant(s) with no apparent congenital anomalies, and 1 (1.5%) woman gave birth to a live infant with a congenital anomaly. No serious AEFIs or pIMDs were considered to be related to the vaccination. In Chinese women aged 9-45 years, immunization with the Cervarix three-dose schedule was well tolerated. Overall, no safety concerns were identified, although rare adverse events may have been missed due to the study sample size.Clinical trial registration: NCT03438006.


Infection with high-risk human papillomavirus is a prerequisite for cervical cancerCervarix is a human papillomavirus-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccineMulti-centre prospective cohort study to monitor safety of Cervarix immunisationSafety was monitored in 3,013 girls/women aged 9­45 years in China (8,839 doses)Cervarix was well tolerated, and no safety concerns were identified.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , População do Leste Asiático , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(3): 2281700, 2023 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38112061

RESUMO

The safety of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, one of the major challenges to public vaccination, has been controversial. This study assessed the adverse reactions of 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccines. This open-label, observational, multi-center, post-marketing study assessed the safety of 9vHPV administered according to local clinical practice. All post-marketing adverse events (AEs) reports received between December 2019 and November 2021 in Chongqing were analyzed. A total of 1000 individuals aged 16-26 years provided safety data post-vaccination; The most common AEs (60.1%) experienced by 9vHPV vaccine recipients were vaccination-site AEs (pain, swelling, induration) and non-vaccination-site AEs (dizzy, weak, fever). Vaccination-site AEs most were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Discontinuations and HPV 9-related serious AEs were rare (0.3% and 0.0%, respectively). Eight SAEs were reported during the study but none were considered as related to the study vaccine. The 9vHPV vaccine was generally well tolerated in subjects aged 16-26 years; Vaccination-site AEs were more common with 9vHPV.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Vacinação , Humanos , China , Dor/etiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapêutico , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto
8.
JNCI Cancer Spectr ; 7(6)2023 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38001029

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although many human papillomavirus (HPV)-targeted therapeutic vaccines have been examined for efficacy in clinical trials, none have been translated into clinical use. These previous agents were mostly administered by intramuscular or subcutaneous injection to induce systemic immunity. We investigated the safety and therapeutic efficacy of an HPV-16 E7-expressing lacticaseibacillus-based oral vaccine. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, a total of 165 patients with HPV-16-positive high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3 were assigned to orally administered placebo or low, intermediate, or high doses of IGMKK16E7 (lacticaseibacillus paracasei expressing cell surface, full-length HPV-16 E7). In the 4 groups, IGMKK16E7 or placebo was administered orally at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 postenrollment. The primary outcomes included histopathological regression and IGMKK16E7 safety. RESULTS: In per-protocol analyses, histopathological regression to normal (complete response) occurred in 13 (31.7%) of 41 high-dose recipients and in 5 (12.5%) of 40 placebo recipients (rate difference = 19.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5 to 37.8). In patients positive for HPV-16 only, the clinical response rate was 40.0% (12 of 30) in high-dose recipients and 11.5% (3 of 26) in recipients of placebo (rate difference = 28.5, 95% CI = 4.3 to 50.0). There was no difference in adverse events that occurred in the high-dose and placebo groups (P = .83). The number of HPV-16 E7-specific interferon-γ producing cells within peripheral blood increased with level of response (stable disease, partial, and complete responses; P = .004). The regression to normal (complete response) rates among recipients with high levels of immune response were increased in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: This trial demonstrates safety of IGMKK16E7 and its efficacy against HPV-16-positive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3. IGMKK16E7 is the first oral immunotherapeutic vaccine to show antineoplastic effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT2031190034.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Papillomavirus Humano 16 , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Displasia do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico
9.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 185(47)2023 Nov 20.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018742

RESUMO

In Denmark, the proportion of children completing the HPV vaccination program is lower than for other vaccines, and the relatively low uptake is believed to be influenced by a media debate on suspected side effects of HPV vaccination. Based on a systematic PubMed search, this review identified 14 Danish studies that compared symptoms or disease incidence among HPV-vaccinated individuals with the incidence in a control group. Most studies showed no association between HPV vaccination and subsequent illness.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Incidência , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Dinamarca
10.
Vaccine ; 41(49): 7444-7449, 2023 Nov 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949754

RESUMO

The safety of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines has been evaluated continuously in pre-licensure clinical trials, post-marketing surveillance systems, and observational studies. Most studies have found no significant association between serious adverse events and HPV vaccination. However, these studies have focused on Western populations; similar studies focusing on Asian populations are insufficient. Our retrospective cohort study used the HPV-vaccination records of junior high-school adolescent girls aged 12-15 years between 2013 and 2018 in Taiwan's National Immunization Information System and linked them to a registry for beneficiaries in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database (NHID) to establish the vaccinated group. We selected 19 serious diseases as serious adverse events. We compared the incidence rates of these serious adverse events between the vaccinated group and girls in the same age group population, and we calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) to evaluate the risk of serious adverse events after HPV vaccination. Because of the onset of different types of diseases, we set three periods after the subjects received HPV vaccination: within 3 months, within 1 year, and during the study period (2013-2018). The results showed the incidence rates and the SIRs of 19 selected adverse events. Among the 19 selected serious adverse events, the disease with the highest incidence rate during the study period was fibromyalgia (73.23 cases per million population), and the disease with the lowest incidence rate during the study period was Crohn's disease (0.15 cases per million population). The results showed no statistically significant increases in the risk of 19 selected serious adverse events and indicated no association between HPV vaccination and serious adverse events. Given the benefits and safety of HPV vaccination, our research can reduce concerns about vaccine side effects, inform health policies and improve public and clinician's acceptance of HPV vaccine policy.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taiwan/epidemiologia , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Criança
11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 102(44): e35865, 2023 Nov 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37933002

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Isaacs syndrome is peripheral nerve hyperexcitability characterized by spontaneous muscle twitching and rigidity and is often associated with antibodies to CASPR2 (contactin-associated protein-like 2) and LGI1 (leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1). But it is a rare Isaacs syndrome with LGI1 and CASPR2 antibodies after human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient presented with limb pain, muscle twitching, numbness in the extremities and around the mouth, and hand rash after the second dose of HPV vaccine. DIAGNOSES: Laboratory tests indicated positive for LGI1 antibodies, CASPR2 antibodies, anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies and anti-sulfatide antibodies, TPO and ATG, IgG E. The patient post-M-wave discharges were seen on F-wave examination of the posterior tibial nerve in both lower limbs. We diagnosis the patient with Isaacs syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with the intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment, after 5 days of IVIG therapy (0.4 mg/kg/day), the rash on the hand disappeared, the pain was relieved, the sleep improved. OUTCOMES: After 3 Courses of treatment, the clinical manifestations of the nervous system disappeared and negative responsibility antibodies profile. LESSONS: This case report suggests a possible adverse reaction to HPV vaccination, which could be treated by attempting several periods of IVIG therapy. The underlying immune mechanisms need to be studied with further extensive data.


Assuntos
Síndrome de Isaacs , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Humanos , Autoanticorpos , Exantema , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular , Síndrome de Isaacs/induzido quimicamente , Síndrome de Isaacs/diagnóstico , Proteínas de Membrana , Proteínas do Tecido Nervoso , Dor , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
12.
BMJ Open ; 13(10): e069616, 2023 10 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37879679

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of therapeutic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines to treat cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or 3 (CIN 2/3). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Global Index Medicus and CENTRAL Cochrane were searched up to 31 January 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Phase II/III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and single-arm studies reporting the efficacy of therapeutic vaccines to achieve regression of CIN 2/3 lesions were included. Studies evaluating only safety and side effects of the vaccine were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two independent reviewers extracted data and evaluated study quality. A random-effect model was used to pool the proportions of regression and/or HPV clearance. RESULTS: 12 trials met the inclusion criteria. Out of 734 women (all studies considered) receiving therapeutic HPV vaccine for CIN 2/3, 414 regressed to normal/CIN 1 with an overall proportion of regression of 0.54 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.69) for vaccinated group; 166 women (from five RCTs) receiving placebo only achieving a pooled normal/CIN 1 regression of 0.27 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.34). When including only the five two-arm studies, the regression proportion for the 410 vaccine group participants was higher than that of the 166 control group participants (relative risk (RR) 1.52; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.04). The pooled proportion of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) clearance was 0.42 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.52) in the vaccine group (six studies with a total of 357 participants) and 0.17 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.26) in the control group (three RCTs with a total of 104 participants). Based on these three RCTs, the hrHPV clearance was significantly higher in the vaccinated group (250 participants) compared with the control group (RR 2.03; 95% CI 1.30 to 3.16). Similar results were found regarding HPV 16/18 clearance. No significant unsolicited adverse events have been consistently reported. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the therapeutic vaccines in the treatment of CIN 2/3 was modest. Implementation issues such as feasibility, acceptability, adoption and cost-effectiveness need to be further studied. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022307418.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Papillomaviridae , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto
13.
Sci Bull (Beijing) ; 68(20): 2448-2455, 2023 10 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37743201

RESUMO

The Escherichia coli-produced human papillomavirus (HPV) 16/18 bivalent vaccine (Cecolin) has received prequalification by the World Health Organization based on its high efficacy and good safety profile. We aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the second-generation nonavalent HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58 vaccine (Cecolin 9) through the randomized, blinded phase 2 clinical trial. Eligible healthy women aged 18-45 years were randomly (1:1) allocated to receive three doses of 1.0 mL (270 µg) of Cecolin 9 or placebo with a 0-1-6-month schedule. The primary endpoint was the seroconversion rate and geometric mean titer of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) one month after the full vaccination course (month 7). The secondary endpoint was the safety profile including solicited adverse reactions occurring within 7 d, adverse events (AEs) occurring within 30 d after each dose, and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring during the 7-month follow-up period. In total, 627 volunteers were enrolled and randomly assigned to Cecolin 9 (n = 313) or placebo (n = 314) group in Jiangsu Province, China. Almost all participants in the per-protocol set for immunogenicity (PPS-I) seroconverted for nAbs against all the nine HPV types at month 7, while two failed to seroconvert for HPV 11 and one did not seroconvert for HPV 52. The incidence rates of total AEs in the Cecolin 9 and placebo groups were 80.8% and 72.9%, respectively, with the majority of them being mild and recovering shortly. None of the SAEs were considered related to vaccination. In conclusion, the E. coli-produced 9-valent HPV (9vHPV) vaccine candidate was well tolerated and immunogenic, which warrants further efficacy studies in larger populations.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Vacinas de Partículas Semelhantes a Vírus , Feminino , Humanos , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Escherichia coli , Papillomavirus Humano , Papillomaviridae , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Combinadas , Vacinas de Partículas Semelhantes a Vírus/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego
14.
Arch Dermatol Res ; 315(10): 2813-2823, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37573268

RESUMO

Treatment of anogenital warts (AGWs) is challenging. Candida antigen immunotherapy has been proven to be a safe and relatively effective therapeutic modality; nevertheless, some patients may experience a partial or no response. Combining Candida antigen with other immunotherapies has been proposed to improve the cure rate. Immunotherapy with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines has been tried with conflicting outcomes. This study aimed to  assess the efficacy and safety of intralesional Candida antigen, either alone or in combination with intralesional bivalent or quadrivalent HPV vaccines, for treating multiple AGWs. Eighty patients with multiple AGWs were included and randomly assigned to four equal groups: group A treated with intralesional Candida antigen only; group B treated with intralesional bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) and Candida; group C treated with intralesional quadrivalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil) and Candida; and group D (control) treated with intralesional saline. Complete clearance of lesions was detected in 40%, 20%, and 60% of patients in Candida monotherapy, Cervarix/Candida, and Gardasil/Candida groups, respectively, whereas 40%, 60%, and 20% of patients in the three groups, respectively, showed partial response. Only 10% of the control group had a partial response. Therapeutic outcomes were significantly better in the three treatment groups compared to the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the Candida monotherapy group and the combination groups, but the response was significantly better in the Gardasil/Candida group than in the Cervarix/Candida group. No statistically significant difference was found between the studied groups regarding the development of side effects. Moreover, no recurrence was detected in any of the groups throughout the 3-month follow-up period.  Based on our results, combining intralesional HPV vaccines with Candida antigen immunotherapy may have no significant benefit for treating multiple AGWs. Candida antigen may be recommended as a relatively effective and inexpensive therapeutic modality. The combination of Gardasil and Candida was also effective but very expensive. The results of the Cervarix/Candida combination were unsatisfactory.  This clinical trial was registered and approved prospectively by the ethical review board at Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University.


Assuntos
Condiloma Acuminado , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Verrugas , Humanos , Candida , Condiloma Acuminado/terapia , Vacina Quadrivalente Recombinante contra HPV tipos 6, 11, 16, 18/efeitos adversos , Papillomavirus Humano , Imunoterapia/métodos , Injeções Intralesionais , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos
15.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(2): 2252252, 2023 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37643747

RESUMO

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the main cause of cervical cancer. HPV vaccination is considered an effective way to prevent cervical cancer. Although the vast majority of people experience no obvious adverse reactions after being vaccinated with HPV vaccine, the continuous monitoring of adverse events following immunization is important. Herein, we report the case of a previously healthy young woman who developed unilateral extraocular muscle palsy after receiving the third dose of the Gardasil HPV 9-valent vaccine (9vHPV) and was diagnosed with myasthenia gravis (MG). The patient developed swelling of the left eye on the 3rd day after vaccination and ptosis of the left eyelid on the 18th day after vaccination. She was treated with oral pyridostigmine and methylprednisolone. Her symptoms began to improve after 2 weeks of treatment and resolved completely after 3 weeks. After excluding other possible causes and considering the close temporal relationship between the timing of the 9vHPV vaccination and the onset of symptoms, 9vHPV appears to have triggered MG. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case report of 9vHPV-associated MG in China. Although ocular MG may be a rare adverse event after vaccination with 9vHPV, there is currently no direct evidence establishing a causal relationship; therefore, the safety of 9vHPV remains unquestioned.


Assuntos
Miastenia Gravis , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Miastenia Gravis/induzido quimicamente , Vacinação , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos
17.
J Dermatol ; 50(11): 1373-1380, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37501372

RESUMO

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is ubiquitously distributed in the population worldwide and its most frequent clinical presentation is cutaneous warts. Despite various treatment options currently available, many patients experience persistent and refractory disease. We sought to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of intralesional HPV 9-valent vaccine for the treatment of recalcitrant warts. A retrospective study was performed for all cases of cutaneous warts treated with intralesional 9-valent HPV vaccine between January 2017 and March 2021. Epidemiologic, clinical, and treatment data, including safety and effectiveness scores, were reviewed. Our cohort was composed of 20 patients: 13 adults and seven children. Twelve patients (60%) displayed a complete response whereas 8 patients (40%) showed a partial response. Older age was associated with a better response to treatment, while a history of laser therapy was associated with a worse prognosis. Adverse events were local, transient, and negligible. No systemic adverse effects were reported. Intralesional 9-valent HPV vaccine may be considered for the treatment of recalcitrant cutaneous warts. Controlled studies are required to confirm these results.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Verrugas , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Verrugas/tratamento farmacológico , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Injeções Intralesionais
19.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1145645, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37377545

RESUMO

This study aims to assess the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines (mRNA and viral vector vaccines) in teenagers and young adults, as compared to Influenza and HPV vaccines, and to early data from Monkeypox vaccination in United States. Methods: We downloaded data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and collected the following Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) reported for COVID-19, Influenza, HPV and Monkeypox vaccines: deaths, life-threatening illnesses, disabilities, hospitalizations. We restricted our analysis to the age groups 12-17 and 18-49, and to the periods December 2020 to July 2022 for COVID-19 vaccines, 2010-2019 for Influenza vaccines, 2006-2019 for HPV vaccines, June 1, 2022 to November 15, 2022 for Monkeypox vaccine. Rates were calculated in each age and sex group, based on an estimation of the number of administered doses. Results: Among adolescents the total number of reported SAEs per million doses for, respectively, COVID-19, Influenza and HPV vaccines were 60.73, 2.96, 14.62. Among young adults the reported SAEs rates for, respectively, COVID-19, Influenza, Monkeypox vaccines were 101.91, 5.35, 11.14. Overall, the rates of reported SAEs were significantly higher for COVID-19, resulting in a rate 19.60-fold higher than Influenza vaccines (95% C.I. 18.80-20.44), 4.15-fold higher than HPV vaccines (95% C.I. 3.91-4.41) and 7.89-fold higher than Monkeypox vaccine (95% C.I. 3.95-15.78). Similar trends were observed in teenagers and young adults with higher Relative Risks for male adolescents. Conclusion: The study identified a risk of SAEs following COVID-19 vaccination which was markedly higher compared to Influenza vaccination and substantially higher compared to HPV vaccination, both for teenagers and young adults, with an increased risk for the male adolescents group. Initial, early data for Monkeypox vaccination point to significantly lower rates of reported SAEs compared to those for COVID-19 vaccines. In conclusion these results stress the need of further studies to explore the bases for the above differences and the importance of accurate harm-benefit analyses, especially for adolescent males, to inform the COVID-19 vaccination campaign.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacinas contra Influenza , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Vacina Antivariólica , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Vacina Antivariólica/efeitos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
20.
Vaccine ; 41(24): 3647-3654, 2023 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37173265

RESUMO

This qualitative study using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions is the first to investigate HPV vaccination in The Gambia; it provides an in-depth analysis of uptake, knowledge, and perceptions of HPV vaccination as well as trust in Ministry of Health vaccination advice. Despite high uptake rates, knowledge of HPV vaccination was low, and the most prominent concern was that the vaccine could cause infertility or is a form of population control. Holistic approaches to addressing HPV vaccine concerns relating to fertility that consider socio-political contexts, including colonial histories, could lead to more positive vaccine perceptions, empowered decisions and to increasing vaccine uptake rates in The Gambia and elsewhere.


Assuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Humanos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Gâmbia , Controle da População , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Vacinação , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus/efeitos adversos , Fertilidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...